"... some thirty million Americans - maintain some type of spiritual belief and practice, even though they no longer feel at home in a church, synagogue, or mosque.
These are the famous 'spiritual but not religious,' philosophically the fastest-growing demographic in the US. Generally, they're educated, liberal, and open-minded, with a deep sense of connection to the Earth and a belief that there's more to life than what appears on the surface.
... contemplatives of different faiths often have more in common with each other than they do with practitioners of their own religion. It comes down to how much we personify or solidify the absolute - whether it's a supreme being who passes judgment on us or an open expanse of love and awareness. In their experience of God, Thomas Merton, Rumi, and Martin Buber had more in common with the Buddha (and each other) than with most practitioners of their own faith.
The difference is that meditation is the very essence of Buddhism, not just the practice of a rarified elite of mystics. It's fair to say that Buddhism is the most contemplative of the world's major religions, which is a reflection of its basic nontheism.
Buddhism is about realization and experience, not institutions or divine authority. This makes it especially suited to those who consider themselves spiritual but not religious." Melvin McCleod, Shambhala Sun, November 2013
See "Psychospiritual Technologies": http://www.johnlovas.com/2012/04/psychospiritual-technologies.html
May you seek, discover and embody, the profound peace, kindness and wisdom that is within us all.
Showing posts with label nontheist. Show all posts
Showing posts with label nontheist. Show all posts
Wednesday, October 2, 2013
Spiritual, but not Religious
Labels:
Buddhism,
contemplation,
contemplative,
ecocentric,
education,
environmental,
liberal,
meditation,
nontheist,
open-minded,
practice,
reify,
religion,
solidify,
spirituality,
theist,
worship
Monday, June 24, 2013
Fear-driven Orthodoxy vs Responsibility for Being a Light Unto Ourselves
"Every religion, at least sometimes, claims that its forms - its literature, its doctrines, its practices - derive from a source of unimpeachable authority. This includes Buddhism. ... Many times I have heard teachers say that since masters of the past were more accomplished than we are and knew what they were doing, we can't tamper with established forms. That even a nontheist religion like Buddhism tends so often to rely on an inflexible source for its forms indicates how desperately many humans long to deflect responsibility for shaping their religious lives."
Rita Gross, Buddhadharma: The Practitioner's Quarterly, Summer 2013
Rita Gross, Buddhadharma: The Practitioner's Quarterly, Summer 2013
![]() |
| 'no mud, no lotus' necklace from: http://www.buddhagroove.com |
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

