"Ask yourself … 'Does this path have a heart?' If it does, the path is good; if it doesn’t it is of no use.” Carlos Castaneda
A powerful contrast to "a path with heart" or experiencing unconditional love as central in one's life, is illustrated in the 2024 Netflix documentary, "Martha." Martha Stewart's parents were unable to show her unconditional love, and Martha likewise was unable to show her only daughter unconditional love. Her marriage and then her relationship with her long-time boyfriend also failed due to this crucial lack. She became a driven perfectionist doer, earning, then losing a billion dollars. She said, with some pride, that she had no interest in "how her boyfriend was feeling. What he was going to do" is what interested her. Martha's life, despite all the fame & fortune, was that of a materialist who couldn't understand why, despite working so hard to perfectly rearrange all the deckchairs on the Titanic, she remained unhappy. See http://www.johnlovas.com/2018/07/healing-basic-wound-of-heart.html
“Not knowing we are loved and lovable makes the heart grow cold. And all the tragedy of human life follows from there."John Welwood. "Perfect Love, Imperfect Relationships. Healing the Wound of the Heart." Trumpeter, 2006.
"The truth is, what one really needs is not Nobel prizes but love. How do you think one gets to be a Nobel laureate? Wanting love, that's how. Wanting it so bad one works all the time and ends up a Nobel laureate. It's a consolation prize.
What matters is love." George Wald - Nobel prize-winning, Harvard biologist
“What really matters is your capacity to turn towards the tenderness of your heart in the midst of that which offends you.” Amoda Maa
Amoda Maa skillfully expands on this (Amoda Maa - 2nd Buddha at the Gas Pump Interview https://batgap.com/amoda-maa-2/ ) :
Amoda Maa (AM): “… the darkness that we see, the chaos that we see, and that
we are seeing increasingly, the horror that we see, the confusion and all of
this that we see is not necessarily a sign of things having gone wrong. It’s a
sign that that very darkness, that very terror, that very horror, is the
place that is the catalyst for the end of division.
As the outer world becomes more divided, more horrifying,
and more terrifying, that’s where we are triggered into our judgments,
our sense of rightness and wrongness, our sense of righteousness, that I am
right, even when I feel wronged. Righteousness is what drives the
division that we see in the world. There’s a lot of that going on today.
But before anything can happen in the outer world, we must first bring about the end of division in the inner
world.
Rick Archer (RA): There’s a polarity in American politics these days, that seems to be unprecedented, and it largely reflects what you just said, the sense of 'I am right.' Even among so-called liberal people, there’s a kind of militant refusal to listen to other perspectives. People are shouted down with bull horns, or forbidden from speaking on campuses if they try to express a perspective that doesn’t jibe with the liberal perspective. People on both sides of that divide are guilty of it.
AM: We see that very obviously in the world, but we don’t see it so easily in ourselves, in our response to that. I still see very intelligent, very open, very spiritual, very conscious people, still operating from inner division, that inner division just is a sense of righteousness. Of course, we must have a sense of discernment in terms of justice in the world and all that, but when we’re giving ourselves to that sense of righteousness in ourselves, we’ve created a very strong us and them in ourselves, a rightness and wrongness in ourselves. That creates further division. If anything’s going to change on the external, in terms of the division that we see in the world, then that response in ourselves has to change first, and then we can move from intelligence, then we can respond intelligently, and that may have a very different outcome.
Going back to the original part of this conversation, the horror and division that we see in the world is precisely the catalyst that we need to reflect on our own inner divided response. Actually, dare I say, it’s a blessing. It’s a gift. It’s the doorway. It’s not that there’s something gone wrong, it’s actually something gone right, in the sense that in order to cleanse ourselves of our own inner divided state, the external world is there to reflect it.
RA: Yes, it’s reminiscent of what you said earlier about heartbreak on an individual level being a potential catalyst for deep realization. The situation in the world can also be a catalyst for maybe collective realization.
AM: It is and I don’t think anything’s going to change in the world until we actually get that or see that, one person at a time.
RA: A lot of people talk these days about the divine feminine. In fact, I just interviewed Vera de Chalambert a month ago, and she was talking a lot about that, and many others do. You make a commentary on this, you say, ‘The new spiritual frequency arising today may have the look and feel of a feminine vibration, but it actually has nothing to do with gender. Rather, it’s about something much more universal. It’s actually a frequency and expression that can come through a female or a male body, or through any life form.’
What’s your whole take on this sort of popularity of the divine feminine that you hear these days, and in light of the point you just made in the passage I read?
AM: I think the conversation around the divine feminine is
prevalent today because it’s a redressing of the balance. It’s a response to
the grip of the masculine or the patriarchal. That’s part of what I’m
saying, but really, the feminine that I’m speaking of is not about anything in
opposition to anything. It’s not got to do with the battle of the sexes, or the
return of a feminist approach, etc. I’m talking about the infusion of love into humanity. And the infusion of love is what’s
been missing. And what I mean by that, if we go a bit deeper, is the capacity to turn towards
gentleness; the capacity
to turn towards the tenderness
of the inner heart, which is not what’s been happening.
Whether we’re on the patriarchal or matriarchal side, in some ways we’re still
operating at the level of some kind of hardness.
So I’m talking about the
capacity to turn towards tenderness in response to our experience, and
therefore in response to each other, and therefore in response to the world,
which requires a shift from mind to heart, through surrender, not through
knowing. And so we can apply that to ‘spiritual practice’ or we can apply that
to the totality of our life’s experience.
And I get the sense that this frequency is beginning to filter in. I call it ‘feminine’ because it’s about surrender, but it’s filtering in through everyone, whether we’re male or female, whether we’re long time on this planet or just born, there’s a different frequency that’s coming through and I guess that’s what I’m referring to. I don’t speak about the feminine much actually.
By tenderness, I’m not talking about passivity, ‘woo woo’ or anything like that. And it’s not got anything with a goddess archetype, it’s got nothing to do with archetypes, stereotypes, roles or concepts.
The tenderness I speak of, if it’s going to serve any purpose, is a tenderness towards our inner experience. If we examine that, we probably can see how we are not tender towards our inner experience, which means that when we have an experience we don’t like, that makes us feel uncomfortable, that makes us feel vulnerable, that makes us feel scared, that makes us feel unloved, that makes us feel alone, or anything like that, then we attempt to reject it, suppress it, deny it, constrict it, change it, maneuver it, squeeze it, spit it out, and so on and so forth. And that is not tenderness. That’s aggression. That’s violence. We are violent towards our own experience.
If you can stop that violence, and choose tenderness towards your experience, then you can forget about spirituality, you can forget about spiritual practice, you can forget about spiritual teachings, and you will live fully awake and fully human. Because that’s what it is – nonviolence towards our inner experience. Because when we’re violent towards our inner experience, what follows that is then ‘I’m wrong,’ or ‘they’re wrong,’ or ‘it’s wrong,’ and then you have become a victim of reality, and as long as you’re a victim of reality, you are separate, and when you’re separate you’re living in the dream of separation, and all horrors, all suffering personal & otherwise, arise from that. So this point about tenderness is key, and way more powerful than the word tenderness implies.
(People who commit terrorist attacks) are at war with their own fear. Everything violent arises out of fear. And that fear may have a thread, a root in a sense of injustice, in a sense of being abused, a sense of not being complete, whole, and safe and one and all of that. So it has a certain intelligence in it, but when we’re violent towards that fear, then it ends up as a violence towards that which appears to be causing that fear, and so then we have the terror, and the war, and the violence in the world.
But if we can turn that tenderness towards ourselves – those of us who have the capacity to do that, a vast majority of the privileged Western world, not all, but certainly a proportion – we do have the capacity to turn that tenderness towards ourselves, towards our inner experience. And that’s very often overlooked. And if we take that as the only spiritual practice there is, I would say that there would be a vast transformation.
One of the things we’re so frightened of is the experience of loss, whether that loss is the loss of a loved one, or the loss of our own life, or the loss of whatever it is we’ve gained – success, or wealth, or love, or recognition – and yet, our willingness to be tender towards that loss is a very profound opening to what can never be lost, which is beingness itself. It’s like meeting death in everything.
Being tender towards loss is again not investing that loss with meaning. It doesn’t mean that you’re bad. It doesn’t mean that you’re unloved. It doesn’t mean that your life is broken. And it doesn’t mean that you’re a failure. We tend to invest loss with a meaning to do with ‘me.’ It’s all about ‘me.’ But to be tender towards that is to feel the absolute shattering of loss, and yet, for we don’t invest ourselves in that, or meaning in that, we discover there is nothing that can be lost.”
Amoda Maa - 2nd Buddha at the Gas Pump Interview https://batgap.com/amoda-maa-2/
“Treat everyone you meet like God in drag.” Ram Dass
“Look at people you don’t love and see them as an exercise for you to open your heart.” Ram Dass
“There are four questions of value in life … What is sacred? Of what is spirit made? What is worth living for and what is worth dying for? The answer to each is the same. Only love.” Lord Byron
“We are all just walking each other home.” Ram Dass
![]() |
Nancy Knox’s Facebook post - thank you Janet! |